Siteground vs Bluehost

For hosting a website, the hosting service should be selected right. This can have a great degree of implication over the performance of your website.

Hence, a business owner must do a significant bit of research before choosing the hosting provider for his website.

Among two of the most preferred website hosting providers in present times are SiteGround and Bluehost. Across their respective categories, either of the service providers is the leader. Either of the options is exceedingly popular and have over 2 million customers each.

So Now Just by Reading this Post, you can make a clear decision that Which one is better for your Siteground OR Bluehost.

In this Post of Bluehost Vs Siteground, We will Compare both the hosting on the bases of every point. After reading this post, you can decide easily to select one of the hostings from Siteground and Bluehost.

I have also Reviewed both the hosting separately in Bluehost Review and Siteground Review where I write about all the cons of the siteground and cons of Bluehost.

Quick Review For Siteground vs Bluehost

Here is the quick review for Bluehost and the siteground to compare head to head.

SIteground Vs Bluehost on Bases of Pros

Here You can See the Pros of Both Hosting Providers

Pros of Both Hosting

Bluehost Pros

Cheap Price
200$ Marketing Offers
30 Day MoneyBack Guarantee
Unmetered Storage
Unmetered Bandwidth

Bluehost vs Siteground on Bases of Cons

Cons of Both Hosting

Siteground Comparison Result

There are many factors to identify the best hosting, for now, we will compare siteground and Bluehost on bases of Performance, Uptime, Price, Features, and Support, etc.

Let’s do a Quick Comparison Result Here

ComparisonSiteGroundBluehostWinner
Reliability More reliableReliableSiteground
PopularityHighly PopularPersistent reductionSiteground
Ease of UseBetter stillGoodSiteground
PricingInitial prices are low but renewal prices are thrice as muchInitial and renewal prices are both lowBluehost
Speed(Response Time)784ms834msSiteground
UptimeUptime 99.99%Uptime 99.99%Draw
Usage LimitStringent caps over resource usageOptions for upgrading memory and CPU are availableBluehost
SupportVigilantBluehost support ratings are not exceptionally highSiteground
FeaturesA plethora of hosting featuresHosting features are fewer in comparisonSiteground
OverallWhile being expensive, Siteground’s performance has varied user-specific hosting features. They offer responsive support.Bluehost services are priced lower and storage limits are higher. But areas of support and performance are lagging in comparisonSiteground

Rated 4.8 By 8478 Users

Siteground is Best WordPress Shared Hosting

Best For Users Who Have Low Traffic With High Potential.

PS: It’s For Shared Hosting Only. Go For Bluehost if Your Hosting Budget is Exceeds 50$/Month.

Rated 2.5 By 349 Users

Bluehost is Good in Cheap Hostings

We do not recommend Bluehost if you are serious about your websites


Siteground vs Bluehost Comparison on Bases of the Following Factors

1. Reliability

Uptime refers to the amount of time that your website stays up and running for viewers. The factors that lead to downtime include server maintenance, hardware failure and power shutdowns at the hosting company’s site. Low uptimes result in loss of credibility, sales, and a website’s SEO rankings. SiteGround and Bluehost, both guarantee 99.99% uptimes.

1.1 Siteground

Siteground uptimes stay close to 100%. Siteground even has an SLA in place, which says that they’d host a client’s website for free for a month if the uptimes are in the range of 99 – 99.9% range. For every 1% of uptime lost below 99%, they’d host the website for one additional month.

1.2 Bluehost

Bluehost is transforming in terms of uptimes provided for end customers. They had an infrastructure overhaul around a couple of years back, following which they incessantly deliver 99.99% uptimes. There are nevertheless cases wherein end-consumers were dissatisfied with Bluehost’s uptimes. They have no SLA, such as the one delivered by SiteGround in place.

1.3 Comparison

Siteground is a reliable hosting services provider and a 99.99% uptime guarantee is fulfilled by SiteGround in a vast majority of cases. Despite Bluehost’s recent improvements, SiteGround is an outright winner in terms of uptimes. Overall, SiteGround delivers the best-shared hosting results across the industry.

2. Performance

Faster websites deliver a range of advantages for a business. To start with, a quicker website gets higher Google page rankings. This reflects in terms of more visitors to a website. Fast loading websites similarly ensure the finest of end-user experience. With higher view times, the end consumer stays engaged and is more likely to convert. End consumers characteristically give three seconds for a website to load. Else, they are likely to browse on. It is therefore important for a website to load fast. This is also a prime branding implement and makes a website and a business come by as reliable.

2.1 Siteground Performance

Siteground is characterized by its quick loading times and this comes by as one of their core competencies. Their loading times are much quicker in the U.S. market. So Siteground comes by as the default choice if most of your consumers are in the US. Website loading times across the rest of the world are average. Siteground is however twice as quick as Bluehost in terms of loading speeds, at all places in the world. They are a clear winner among the two over the parameter. But their websites take over 3 seconds for loading at many places in the world.
2.2 Bluehost

2.2 Bluehost Performance

Across the US, Bluehost is not able to match up with the website loading speeds delivered by SiteGround. SiteGround’s website loading times are quicker by around 1.5 seconds across most US destinations. Bluehost is nevertheless ranked 3 is website loading speeds, with SiteGround at the first spot. In Singapore, site loading times provided by the two web hosting services are nearly the same. Similarly across European destinations such as Amsterdam and Asian destinations such as New Delhi, SiteGround is much quicker as compared to Bluehost. Bluehost, like SiteGround, deliver their fastest loading times across the US. On a global scale, website loading times are below average.

2.3 Speed Comparison – Winner is Siteground

Siteground scores above Bluehost in terms of website loading speeds. While the average site loading speed for Siteground is 1.10 seconds, the one for Bluehost is 2.60 seconds. The part of the world where one compares the services of the two web hosting providers is of little relevance. Siteground is the better performer. Siteground hence may be the better choice for ensuring a top-notch experience for your end-customers. One of the factors that help Siteground ensure top site loading times for their clients is the 5 data centers that they have across the world. This ensures that the data has to travel a shorter physical distance. This directly reflects over site load times. Siteground’s data centers are located in Singapore, Milan, Amsterdam, London, and Chicago. A fine idea for a business, when choosing a web hosting provider is to go ahead with the one who has a data center in their vicinity. For example, if a business expects a majority of end customers to be from London, they must preferably go ahead with a web hosting provider that has a data center in London. Similarly, if a business is willing to invest in CDN for its website, it simplifies the matters.

Performance ComparisonBluehostSiteground
Response Time (in ms)700-900347-700
Fully Loaded Time (in a sec)2.61.1
Total Requests1010
Page Size322327
Links to ResultResult PageResult Page

3. Uptime

Uptimes stay towards the higher side in the case of either web hosting providers. But a Service Level Agreement (SLA) makes services of SiteHost more reliable. SiteGround uses automated software to notify them of a website’s downtime and lets them start work instantaneously.

3.1 Siteground

Siteground’s customers seldom have to worry about downtimes. 99.99% uptimes imply 4 hours lost in six months.

3.2 Bluehost

Bluehost is ranked #2 in terms of uptimes, while SiteGround is ranked #1. Their uptimes frequently stay in the line of 99.97%.

3.1 Uptime Comparison – Winner is SiteGround

Over the past 6 months, SiteGround has delivered 99.99% uptimes while Bluehost has delivered 99.97% uptimes. Outages have been lower on part of the site host. site host emerges as the obvious winner in terms of uptimes. They keep a website up and running at all times, and are the preferred vendor for the KPI.

Uptime ComparisonBluehostSiteground
Average99.97%99.99%

4. Usage Limit

Usage limits must be kept in mind before choosing a web hosting provider. Several parameters define the usage limits of a package offered by a web hosting provider. They include ways in which a web hosting provider handles high traffic, storage limits over the website, and the number of email accounts provided. So a business must have an idea of its requirements and choose the web hosting provider accordingly. A vendor becomes more suitable when it delivers quality services at affordable prices. A web hosting provider may have multiple plans in place for a business’s choosing.

4.1 Siteground

In each of SiteGround plans, there are stringent limits over the storage capacity available. 10 GB makes room for most requirements, but not numerous HD images and heavy videos. It may not be the best choice for high traffic websites.

4.2 Bluehost

Bluehost offers high storage space and plans with unlimited storage. It is an obvious choice for websites that need a lot of storage space.

4.3 Comparison

SiteGround uses SSD, unlike Bluehost, which uses traditional storage drives. So Bluehost delivers more storage space, while SiteGround delivers faster websites. Similarly with SiteGround, one can get as many subdomains as required. Bluehost also offers unlimited domains with higher plans. Siteground delivers unlimited email accounts with limited storage. Bluehost’s higher plans ensure unlimited email accounts with unlimited storage.

5. Support

Customer support helps overcome everyday end-customer problems associated with server connectivity, downtimes, and security.

5.1 Siteground

Siteground makes 24/7 support available using phone, email, and chat. The support is believed to be the best provided by hosting companies. It is fast, friendly and resourceful.

5.2 Bluehost

In comparison, Bluehost is found to be lagging in terms of support. They are slower and less resourceful in comparison. The support services are nevertheless accessible all day, over phone or email.

5.3 Comparison

When we compare the support services provided by the two web hosting providers, Bluehost does not match up with SiteGround. As an example, while Bluehost may take a couple of minutes to connect, SiteGround responds within a few seconds.

6. Ease of Use

Bluehost and SiteGround, both come close in terms of ease of use. Either offer solutions based upon cPanel. They have several common features, such as PHPMyAdmin, email accounts, a file manager and FTP accounts. A user can also enable Cloudflare (a popular CDN) easily over both providers.

6.1 Siteground

SiteGround’s overall approach is cleaner in comparison.

6.2 Bluehost

While being easy to use and intuitive, Bluehost backend is a custom cPanel version. The major issue is that this comes with the promotion of paid tools and up-sell pitches, which may not amuse the end customer.

6.3 Comparison

Either score well in terms of ease of use and intuitive backends. Bluehost is more sales among the two.

7. Features

A web hosting provider is characterized by several features and they must be chosen based upon a business’s requirements. One of such features is backups. The loss of data reflects over the functioning and accuracy of websites. It may come in the form of data theft or operational losses and affects critical decision-making processes.

7.1 Siteground

SiteGround delivers sound assurance in terms of backups. This comes in the format of a daily copy of the website for the past 30 days. Moreover, it takes only seconds to restore a previous backup. Security copies of a website can be downloaded with the use of a generic cPanel tool. SiteGround also has a Backup on Demand system in place. But it is available only on Go Geek and GrowBig plans. This makes it possible to back up the entire system before an update, with a single click. Similarly, WordPress is easy to install for SiteGround. Auto system and plugin updates are also possible. SiteGround also features an in house Caching system and a sandbox area to try out coding changes. The latter feature is available only for GoGeek and GrowBig plans.

7.2 Bluehost

Bluehost has removed the cPanel feature that creates auto backups. For 2 lower plans, the offer a Backup add-on at an additional cost. This comes free with higher plans. While WordPress is easy to install, auto system and plugin updates are not possible. A plugin is necessary to install for an in house caching system. Bluehost offers no staging area as well, so trying out code changes is difficult in comparison with SiteGround.

7.3 Comparison

Either of the web hosting providers does well at FTP and SFTP accounts, email accounts, bandwidth, and SSL & HTTP/2. In terms of storage, Bluehost does a better job. But in areas of WordPress features, backups and Git & SHH access, SiteGround does a better job. Overall SiteGround delivers more sound features for its customers.

8. Pricings

Prices frequently reflect on quality in terms of web hosting. More affordable solutions may be comparatively lagging in terms of quality.

8.1 Siteground

SiteGround is generally the more expensive alternative among the two.

8.2 Bluehost

Each of the Bluehost’s three plans is less expensive in comparison with corresponding SiteGround plans.

8.3 Comparison

Each of the companies offers significant discounts over the first year of hosting. While Bluehost is cheaper, SiteGround delivers value for money.

ComparisonBluehost (Choice Plus )Siteground (Grow Big)
Normal Pricings14.99$19.95$
Pricing For New Users (Yearly)95$ (215$ for 3 Years)71$
Free DomainYesNo

9. Overall

SiteGround, overall, scores above Bluehost. Their shared hosting is characterized by advanced options such as staging, higher performance, and better support.

9.1 Siteground

SiteGround has expertise across WordPress Expertise and the features delivered. They are better than Bluehost over speed, uptimes, and service across locations. Siteground’s security team is vigilant and effective. Timely backups safeguard site data.

9.2 Bluehost

Bluehost is a fine choice for a business that has budget constraints or requires higher storage space for the website. Similarly, when prime performance is not a critical constraint, Bluehost delivers satisfactory services.

9.3 Comparison

At renewal, either of the services calls for the same price. Backup options, prompt support and caching system further rule in SiteGround’s favor.

Final Words

Siteground delivers a great website over the long term. Their services also come with a 30-day full money-back guarantee if you do not like their services, which is seldom the case. Git repository and staging area are advanced hosting features that Siteground provides. SiteGround becomes the obvious choice over Bluehost, but a client is required to pay for his domain.